PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PEMALSUAN SURAT KETERANGAN HASIL RAPID ANTIGEN COVID-19

The purpose of this study is to examine law enforcement against the crimeof falsifying certificates and examine the accuracy of the judge's decision inimposing a criminal offense against the crime of counterfeiting a certificateresulting from the rapid antigen Coved-19 in Decision Number:557/Pid.B/2021/PN Jkt.Utr.This research was motivated by the falsification of the rapid test letter asstated in the decision number 557/Pid.B/2021/PN Jkt. Utr. In the decision, it wasexplained that on Saturday, March 27, 2021, after the Defendant had made 4(four) sheets of Covid-19 Rapid Test Result Certificate, then the Defendantwrapped the letter in an envelope to be sent to the customer and at that time thedefendant would send the letter to the JNE Expeditionary which located on JalanCendrawasih Sukapura, North Jakarta. Furthermore, the defendant and theevidence were taken to the Tanjung Priok Port Police for further investigation.The type of research used is normative juridical, the nature of the researchis descriptive. The data source used is secondary data. The data collectiontechnique is by conducting library research and document studies on criminalsanctions against the criminal act of falsifying the COVID-19 rapid antigen resultcertificate.The results showed that law enforcement in Decision Number:557/Pid.B/2021/PN Jkt. Utr, which refers to the theory of full enforcement ofcriminal law. Law enforcement officers arrested the defendant. The next step issubmitted to the District Court in the area where the crime occurred, namely theNorth Jakarta District Court, in order to decide in the fairest way possible for theactions that have been carried out by the Defendant. The Panel of Judges decidedby imposing a prison sentence on the Defendant for 1 (one) year and 6 (six)months and determined that the period of arrest and detention that the Defendanthad served was reduced, entirely from the sentence imposed. This decision is theright one, considering that the decision handed down to the Defendant is stillbelow the demands of the Public Prosecutor, namely for 2 (two) years in prison.In terms of justice, that the verdict is fair, because the defendant has actuallycommitted a criminal act of falsifying a certificate of rapid antigen test resultswith the intention of making a profit. For his actions, it was detrimental to theinstitution and the good name of Dr. Fredik C Okoseray and Firdaus Hospital. Interms of legal benefits, it is beneficial for the defendant and for others with theintention of providing a deterrent effect, so that in the future they do not commitacts that violate the law. In terms of the value of legal certainty, if the provisionsin the law state that the act committed is a criminal act, then the person concernedmust be punished.Keywords: Law Enforcement, Crime of Counterfeiting of Covid-19 RapidAntigen Result Certificate, Decision Number: 557/Pid.B/2021/PNJkt.Utr