PELANGGARAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA TERHADAP KELOMPOK AGAMA DAN PENGANUT KEPERCAYAAN DI INDONESIA

This thesis aims to analyze the actions taken by law enforcement officialsin dealing with human rights violations against the right to freedom of religionand belief in Indonesia and the efforts made by the government in providing legalprotection to victims of human rights violations against freedom of religion andbelief in Indonesia.This type of normative juridical research is descriptive with a statutoryapproach. Data sources use secondary data. Data analysis by examination,grouping, processing, evaluated and concluded. Data analysis uses grammaticaland theological interpretation methods.The results of the study stated that the rise of human rights violationsrelated to freedom of religion and belief in Indonesia was caused by the police'slack of assertiveness in implementing protection for minorities and the presenceof security forces not being quick to prevent or sending too few securitypersonnel. Besides that, human rights violations related to freedom of religion andbelief, with the issuance of Regional Regulations that support the occurrence ofacts of discrimination in relation to freedom of religion and belief. The existenceof government institutions also plays a role in violating the rights and religiousfreedom of minorities. These state institutions include the Ministry of Religion,the Coordinating Board for the Controlling of Community Trust (Bakor Pakem)under the Attorney General's Office.Efforts made by the government in providing legal protection to victims ofhuman rights violations against freedom of religion and belief in Indonesia havebeen realized by improving the system in the Criminal Court, so that theperpetrators can be legally processed by law enforcement officers (police,prosecutors and judges). The government provides compensation for victims ofgross human rights violations decided by the human rights court. Whereas theright of restitution for victims of a criminal offense is decided by the court, in thiscase the District Court. Other efforts that can be done are the regional governmentis obliged to facilitate the "availability of locations" for the construction of housesof worship when the signature requirements are met. For this reason, the policemust be firm in religious violence, focusing on the perpetrators of violence, notvictims of violence, with criminal penalties for the perpetrators. commensuratewith the severity of the crime and taking disciplinary action against allgovernment officials, including the minister of religion, who make statements orengage in actions that promote discrimination or declare religious violence.
Keywords: Violations, Human Rights, Religious Groups and Believers