KAJIAN YURIDIS TERHADAP KASUS PENCURIAN DENGAN PEMBERATAN PADA PUTUSAN NO.: 164/Pid.B/2015/PN Skt.

The purpose of this study is to analyze the judges 'consideration and thecontent of judges' ruling on the case of criminal theft with a weighting in thedecision. 164 / pid.b / 2015 / PN SKT. It also examines the implementation offormal law and material law in the case of criminal theft with such deduction.The background of the research that the problem of theft with theweighting is still common in the community. This decision is interesting toexamine because there are several elements of weighting in the case of theft.The research method consists of: research approach is done by approachof law and approach of case. The legal substance consists of the primary legalmaterials in the form of laws and other relevant regulations. The secondary lawmaterial consists of a judge's verdict. The method of analysis is done byqualitative juridical.The conclusion of the research that judge's consideration in the case oftheft with a weighting in Decision No. : 164 / Pid.B / 2015 / PN Skt. containsconsiderations of indictments, facts, legal considerations. The factualconsideration concerns the testimony of witnesses, the prosecution witness andthe lightening witnesses, the consideration of the defendant's statement, theconsideration of the evidence. Legal consideration is the assessment of elementsof crime in the indictment. The flow of decision making is in accordance with theprovisions of criminal procedure law. In addition, the assessment of the provisionsof the criminal act of theft with the weighting is in accordance with the usualinterpretation used in criminal law.Keywords: Judicial Review, Theft with a weighting