đ
04 December 2025
DOI: 10.59485/jtemp.v6i2.154
Comparative Performance Analysis of Imported vs. Local NIBP Simulators against Blood Pressure Monitor Using Uncertainty Method
MEDIKA TRADA : Jurnal Teknik Elektomedik Polbitrada
Politeknik Bina Trada Semarang
đ Abstract
Calibration of non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) devices is essential to ensure measurement accuracy in healthcare services. This study aims to compare the performance of two calibrators, XB1000 and Multisim, in testing two NIBP units using the uncertainty analysis method. Measurements were conducted on systolic, diastolic, and heart rate parameters with a total of 16 data points per parameter. The results show that XB1000 achieved a lower total average expanded uncertainty (U95) of 0.421 mmHg compared to Multisim at 0.529 mmHg. Specifically, XB1000 demonstrated the lowest uncertainty across all parameters, with an overall 20.3% improvement over Multisim. Error analysis indicated that systolic measurements had an average error of 2.063 mmHg, diastolic -1.167 mmHg, and heart rate -0.062 bpm. Based on these findings, XB1000 is recommended as the preferred calibrator for NIBP devices, as it provides lower measurement uncertainty and improved accuracy across all tested parameters.
đ Keywords
#Kalibrasi; Non-Invasive Blood Pressure; Ketidakpastian Pengukuran; Calibration; Non-Invasive Blood Pressure; Measurement Uncertainty
âšī¸ Informasi Publikasi
Tanggal Publikasi
04 December 2025
Volume / Nomor / Tahun
Volume 6, Nomor 2, Tahun 2025
đ HOW TO CITE
Isabela, Safariati Isabela; Nuryanto Budisusila, Eka; Isabela, Safariati; Nuryanto Budisusila, Eka, "Comparative Performance Analysis of Imported vs. Local NIBP Simulators against Blood Pressure Monitor Using Uncertainty Method," MEDIKA TRADA : Jurnal Teknik Elektomedik Polbitrada, vol. 6, no. 2, Dec. 2025.
ACM
ACS
APA
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Download Citation
0
Sitasi
Cek Google Scholar