📅 25 May 2019
DOI: 10.33061/wh.v24i1.2998

PENGUJIAN SAH TIDAKNYA PENETAPAN TERSANGKA DALAM KERANGKA PRAPERADILAN

Wacana Hukum
Universitas Slamet Riyadi

📄 Abstract

A pretrial construction as it has been regulated in the Indonesian CriminalProcedure Code had instantly changed after the Constitutional Court decision Number : 21/PUU-XII/2014 that being announced on April 28, 2015. The pretrial construction was initially authorized only to examine and decide the validity of arrest and detention, the validity of investigation and prosecution termination, and the demand for compensation or rehabilitation. The authority of the pretrial by a quo decision was then expanded by adding an examination on the validity of inquiry, the validity of confiscation, and the validity of suspect determination. Although a quo decision is reputed tohave exceeded the authority of the Constitutional Court because it is judged of creating a new norm, a quo decision remains final and tied so that it should be considered as a complement to the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code.

🔖 Keywords

#KUHAP; Pre-trial; Determination of Suspects.

â„šī¸ Informasi Publikasi

Tanggal Publikasi
25 May 2019
Volume / Nomor / Tahun
Volume 24, Nomor 1, Tahun 2019

📝 HOW TO CITE

Alfiananda, Rizky Fakhry, "PENGUJIAN SAH TIDAKNYA PENETAPAN TERSANGKA DALAM KERANGKA PRAPERADILAN," Wacana Hukum, vol. 24, no. 1, May. 2019.

ACM
ACS
APA
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver

🔗 Artikel Terkait dari Jurnal yang Sama

📊 Statistik Sitasi Jurnal

Tren Sitasi per Tahun